Thursday, May 24, 2012

Stop Seeking and Relish It: Guest Teaching by Suzanne Foxton




















WELCOME.  For those of you keeping score at home, as the baseball announcers say, this is the eighteenth offering in our Guest Teaching Series.  Readership for the site continues to grow, so it doesn't look like I killed the whole deal by posting a column of my own last week.  Incredibly, I even got a number of supportive emails--God bless you for those!  They keep me from wondering if I'm one of the proverbial hundred monkeys with a typewriter. Now, I ask you readers and this week's Guest Teacher, Suzanne Foxton, to forgive me, but there is some large news this week, and since it affects Awakening Clarity, I need to share it here and now.

FIRST OFF, please see the Housekeeping Notes at the bottom of this page that will detail some very positive changes that we've made to the site recently.  I'm really excited about where this site is headed, and I hope you'll continue to spread the word for us.  I just signed up Gangaji on Tuesday, and Joan Tollifson on Wednesday for end-of-summer posts.  There's a new note-board on the side panel that will keep you up to date on upcoming teachers.  Chris Hebard, whom many of you know from the Stillness Speaks website, has just sent in an original piece from his vacation desk in Switzerland, and he'll be our guest for the next main-board post, which will be in two weeks, on June 8.

YES, TWO WEEKS, not one. The great news is that I'm writing a book for Non-Duality Press and it's coming along nicely.  It'll be a little different than most Nondual titles.  The other news is that I'm going to have to really hunker down for several months in order to finish it.  So, beginning with this week's post, I'll be taking Awakening Clarity's new, main-board posts bi-weekly.  I have not made this decision lightly, but out of necessity. I'm still earning a living, have a wife-life that needs tending, a website to manage and edit, and now I have a book to write.  I've squeezed my clock for all I'm worth, but there's just no getting any more hours out of it.  Awakening Clarity takes up quite a bit more time than my business, so to cut that load almost in half is going to be a real windfall for me, which I can then devote to the book.  The Guest Writer pages will continue to be updated, as will the Events and Announcements section, and the Pointers Page.  If the gods move me with a suitable subject, I'll still update the Inverse Journal.  But the actual posts, which will all be in the GTS series, will come out every two weeks.  So, I wrote one post after four months, and suddenly it looks like I'm bowing out for another four or so! That wasn't my plan, but apparently it was the plan.

 
SUZANNE FOXTON was raised as Suzy Howell, a nice young woman from Indiana who let her heart carry the rest of her body off to England, where she now lives with her husband and two children.  One night she was washing dishes and her entire world view changed completely.  The background to her awakening was a long period of intense psycho-therapy, where she'd stripped a way a lot of egoic layers.  As for the rest, let's let her tell it herself, in this borrowed paragraph from her Nonduality Magazine interview:  

"In the midst of this, I was washing some dishes. I took a knife from the sink. The knife became an amazing wonder; it was exactly right;  it was the most knifish knife that ever knifed; it was life, knifing. A kind of vision engulfed me, or replaced me; my mind needed to supply visuals, so I seemed to see a sort of cosmic winking in and out, creation on a grand and colourful scale, swirling being sucked into some kind of black hole and renewing, over and over again. I knelt on the kitchen floor. "Whoa!" I said, like Bill and Ted on their  excellent adventure. I then wandered around the kitchen, saying to the ether, "It's so obvious. It's so obvious!"  

WE MIGHT BE TEMPTED to call such a thing an amazing experience, but since it's never gone away, which is the very nature of experience, it must not be an experience at all.  It must be something else.  We could call this something else a shift, which wouldn't be wrong, but let's let Suzanne herself name it.  In her Nondual novel, published by our friends at Non-Duality Press, she calls it The Ultimate Twist.  That's as good a name as any for the thing that cannot be named.

FOR A WHILE THERE, Suzanne may have best been known as the woman who wrote her blog faster than a speeding bullet, or even Superman himself!  I heard her tell BATGAP's Rick Archer that she has about a quarter million words on it thus far.  That is some serious blogging!   She's not producing so much as she was early on--which seems to be the normal course of these things--but what she puts up is terrific.  What I love is that Suzanne is not afraid to play. We can get so caught up in all of the Very Serious Nonduality Stuff and Very Serious Life Stuff that we can forget that in the end, it's all just a story, it's all always and already just fine, and that the gift of this teaching is that at long last, we get to just relax.  That doesn't mean we don't care, or don't take care in out lives; quite the opposite.  It means that without the burden of a stressful story we can act from wisdom instead of fear.  Suzanne does so, and she's a joy to watch, read, or listen to.  She's funny, too!

JUST AS THEY ALL ARE, my Suzanne Foxton story is shallow and embarrassing, which is precisely why I'm telling it on myself in public.  Why not?  As I've said here before, I call my ego Lazarus, because it won't die for more than three days at a time.  I kind of like him.  With these embarrassing intros I get to watch Lazarus squirm in his chair and kick up a fuss! Eckhart Tolle used to talk about "allowing the diminution of ego".  Eckhart, I really heard you, pal. I find the process to be pretty big fun, but then again I am a hermit, so my life is not exactly full of sirens and whistles.  Still, you try it out if you like; I think it was great advice.

AT ANY RATE, a year or so ago I was plowing through Scott Kiloby's Kilologues  when I fell upon an interview he'd done with Suzanne.  So, somewhere in the interview Scott says something to the effect of, "I have on the line with me today the lovely Suzanne Foxton."  Hello.  I'm sorry, but what man in his right mind is not going to be a chump for that line?  So in my shallow and Neanderthalic way, I paused the interview and immediately Googled her.  I was transported to Nothing Exists, Despite Appearances, which is Suzanne's blog. I wasn't disappointed either; she is indeed very pretty.  But while I was there, perhaps to keep up my spiritual appearances, and thus not self-confess to having completely acquiesced to this unit's ridiculous maleness, I began to read her stuff. Wow!  I wasn't disappointed there either.  Suzanne's view, if you will, is a radical one; she's not taking any prisoners.  She smacks you on the head with a purity and cleanness that we don't often find.  She has graced us here with an absolutely fabulous original post. This thing could cause The Ultimate Twist all by itself; no kidding.

LET ME ADD that the real beauty on Suzanne's site is her art.  I didn't have the nerve to steal her pictures to decorate this piece, but I sure wanted to.  I am using the picture she sent in, which is also the namesake of this article, Relish.  Here's another confession.  I have been married to three women who all have degrees in Art History, and I still don't know much about art.  (I do know quite a bit about Art History majors, however, and I'm hanging on to the last one!)  So, in my abundant ignorance I haven't a clue as to how she creates these things, but I am absolutely crazy about them.  She says it's collage and marker, A3 size, scanned in and slightly blurred and blended in Photoshop. Whatever that process entails, its result is cool.  You'd expect that, though, because if I had to use one word to describe Suzanne Foxton, it would be the word "cool".  She's a seriously hip Londoner now, regardless of her more pedestrian roots here in the colonies, or the wife and mother roles she's so devoted to.  She's now working on a second book, and is slowly attempting to turn her first book into a musical for the stage. 

FOR THE SERIOUSLY fashion conscious among you, let me say that for great clothes, I recommend watching her interview on Conscious TV.  I have embedded a clip down below.  My wife, who often dresses in a similar fashion, gave her two enthusiastic thumbs up for the outfit.  So let me get out of this cool woman's way and let her talk.

AND NOW . . .


STOP SEEKING AND RELISH IT
By
Suzanne Foxton



THE SEARCHING ENDS NOW. There is nothing to find but what is. There is nothing that needs to happen but what is happening. There is nothing new to know that will bring further revelation. There are so many fascinating, moving, absorbing stories which cannot yet be enjoyed, for they have too much of the burden of redemption upon them. Redemption is here, now, for there is only here and now, and infinite immediate possibility. You are not that small thing, the constructed identity named Felicity or Gerald, charged with the impossible tasks of perfect life or perfect love. You are what perfect life and perfect love emerges from; simple knowing, pure being, absolute awareness, bare sentience. That which looks, looks for itself, and it is everywhere; it is everything.

ALL SEEKERS  either give up and live life, or end up finding that reality is exactly as it has always been; the obviousness of it is the punch of the "ah ha" moment  that some people seem to experience. Life as it arises, so rife with discontent, is exactly what was sought, and now seems full of contentment. We are in paradise. This is paradise. It always has been. Value judgments usually fall by the wayside, but if they don’t, enjoy them.

MAYBE SEEKERS have too many expectations about what "this" or "awakening" or "enlightenment" is. Your brain/mind can seem to "come back" and "claim" an experience; however you perceive and label such an apparent happening is this too. There is nothing that is not this. That's what an "ah ha" moment means, and why it's so amusing. What you are looking for is everything, just the way it is. It is occluded by its omnipresence. It's so simple, you can't possibly believe it's so obvious.

 

SOME SEEKERS MEDITATE, convinced that the peace of the absence of thought – the “stillness” so desired by so many – is what “this” truly is.  Moments of peace are great, but they aren't especially "this". They are “this” in yet another guise. Doubt, resistance, fear - this in an egoic guise. However, when "this" is "realised", there seems to be less resistance, doubt and fear, which is what the ego craves:  for things, generally, to be “better”.  There are no guarantees about what the quality of life will be, in the story that seems to unfold, if wholeness is apprehended. The only guarantee is that whatever it is that seems to be happening, thought, or felt is “this”. EVERYTHING is what the seeker searches for. You can stop looking. THIS IS IT!

YET HUMANITY CONTINUES to search and strive - desperately working for peace, or inciting hatred. Despite the apparently widely varying motivations and personalities, we are all the same. Strip away the belief systems of the mind, look in the mirror and know absolutely that the person seen is just the same as what the Taliban member sees who wakes up in the morning, looks into his bit of mirrored glass and reaches for his turban. That sense of self, of I Exist, of I Am, that seems so singular and special and ours - that consciousness is shared. And simply that, is what these words point to. It is tempting put a lot of importance on the thoughts, the story of existence; the people who write about oneness, Advaita, consciousness, awareness, or whatever we're calling it, go to great lengths to try and devalue the mind and the thoughts, and the personality they weave, the personality so often mistaken for that shared consciousness. 

THE STORY OF dispelling the identity, of discrediting it, is evidently the most important of all. "Why are you unhappy? Because 99.9% of everything you think, and everything you do, is for yourself, and there isn't one," says Wei Wu Wei. There is a great urge to end the suffering that the misguided attribution of the story equaling the Self apparently causes. There is a lot of energy devoted to insisting that the sense of separation - the effect of this misattribution - is incorrect, and not the clear seeing of absolute reality. Or, the self and its personality are celebrated, and the oneness of shared consciousness is rejected as too dry and arid; the story of life is treasured, and the tasks presented by life are deeply valued. If we all see clearly our shared consciousness, say some, then we'll be a world healed, working together for a common, loving goal; we will be love in action. Or, say others, if we lose our value of the separate life, we will be passionless, and be unmoved by the plight of mankind, and unmotivated to work for peace, healing and harmony. Or perhaps, say the haters of dispassion, if we lose our personalities and passions, the world will be a dull, saccharine place, full of do-gooders with no hopeless cases to take under their wing, all happy-clappy, touchy-muchy and healy-feely. Bleagh, they say. Where is the wholeness, the interest, the variety, in that?

 "Relish" by Suzanne Foxton

DISPASSIONATE OR DYNAMIC, consciousness shared or consciousness split, all that is and all that thought labels it - everything is oneness. Absolutely everything is; there are no mistakes. The most horrific errors, a split-second of poor reflex or a well-considered, but misjudged, decision, even these are not mistakes. The child that runs into the road, hit; the sober drunk that picks up drink and drugs again after many years of abstinence; the inappropriate career chosen, the person married in convenience or pressure rather than love; any of the long list of things we could change, if only we could go back in time; even these are not mistakes. Even the most painful, life-thwarting feelings and urges are not mistakes. Everything unfolds both to no purpose, and to grand purpose, in the context of the story of a life. Life is everything; bliss and despair, pain and great, soaring pleasure. And all of it is bearable. There is suffering, and the end of suffering is so often sought, both by seekers of enlightenment, and most human beings, convinced that the pain is theirs and theirs alone, that pain defines them, that pain is useless, that pain is to be avoided or dispelled. But pain and suffering - some say that suffering is pain + resistance to pain - in the unfolding story, is often very useful. And even if it's not, and all of it is meaningless, and it is seen that whatever seems to be happening is just as it should be - there is nothing wrong with suffering. 

PERHAPS, in the context of a story, structured by systems of belief, organised by the restless mind into some kind of sense, suffering that lingers is not so useful. But suffering, in any story, usually changes; wait around long enough, and everything changes. No matter how involving and intense the story of your life seems to be, that story - those feelings - those events, those others whom you struggle to interact with - they are not your sum total. You are all of it, and none of it; life is its own beneficiary; great pain and delicious pleasure are the same thing. No matter what seems to be happening, even if it seems to be happening to you and you alone, is just what must happen. Your life, with all its resistance, all the wrong thinking, all those errors you wish had never happened, is perfect, blessed and whole. There is nothing wrong with you. There is nothing wrong. Ever.

EVERY CONCEPT IS A PRISON, even the concept “there is nothing wrong – ever”.  Yet every concept exists in complete freedom. There is nothing you can do, nothing to be done, except what is. Whatever your next move is, whatever the current plan, each apparent action, each apparent feeling, no matter how to the point or not, is what is.  If thoughts arise, reinforcing themselves, in the form of strong urges to investigate and practice traditional Advaita or any other practices that will strip away the ego, those are the urges that arise. There is no goal; the goal is always met, in whatever it is that appears. There is no struggle, although there is often the appearance of one, and this apparent struggle is beautiful, for it is what is. 


THE HUMAN CONDITION of being self-aware is not a problem; it is what is. The minor conflicts of seekers and critics and teachers of enlightenment on the Internet isn't a cause for deep introspection or casual dismissal, although either of these might come up. The epic conflicts of people apparently faced with their imminent destruction, or the destruction of their sacred ideas, or the destruction of races and nations, are not the proving grounds of humanity. Humanity needs no proving ground; humanity has not lost its way, or if it seems to have, the story has simply shifted to an archetypal apocalyptic tale. There is nothing wrong with humanity; there is nothing wrong with "you", however many thoughts come up that say there is something terribly wrong, and those things are this, this, and especially “this”. Everything is just exactly as it must be, no matter what is looks like, smells like, feels like, sounds like, or how it seems to be judged. Whatever your character does, that is perfect. Whatever you do, it is what must be. And in the story that seems to unfold, immediate presence is usually not expressed in destruction - although there must be destruction and creation both, in duality. This is paradise. There is nothing else.

SO EVERYTHING, absolutely everything in the appearance is already the immaculate expression of being. This includes everything, with no exceptions. It includes all the billions of incongruities and irresolvable dilemmas that crop up when one story seems to intersect another, and there are so, so many stories. It includes scientific outrage at the concept of oneness, and the disparagement heaped upon various Advaita disciplines (or lack of discipline) by various other Advaita practices. It seems a chaotic bundle, a confusing dichotomy, or a plate full of impossible choices; but whatever it is that seems to be arising, whatever this is, is perfectly and exquisitely whole. There is nothing to be done, it is done. Perhaps there are still a lot of questions that come up, and the questions can be asked until it is realised that there are no questions, for there are no answers; there is no problem; whatever seems to be is what is, and it is just as it must be. 

THERE ARE SO MANY apparent individuals who cling to the desire to make the story just right, and there is nothing wrong with that; but in fact, despite the appearance of so many of them, there are no stories. Stories need time to unfold, and there is no time. In fact, there is nothing at all, despite the appearance of vastness in the cosmos, and vastness in the minute workings of matter at the tiniest level. Nothing is happening, despite the appearance of great workings and doings and contrivance; there is nothing at all but the light that makes the appearance possible. It is the deepest reality, the absolute source, consciousness, oneness, whatever you wish to label it. It is the biggest thing in any apparent room, or field, or space station gazing down on the Earth. It is the only thing. There is no need to detach, or self-inquire, or be the stillness, or know yourself completely, although these apparent actions can arise. Your ego can't kill your ego. Trying to kill yourself, stripping one apparent layer back at a time, until there is nothing left, certainly seems the right way to go about seeing the absolute, but it is here already. Whatever it is that seems to need to be done will be done. It seems to unfold, flawlessly despite the flaws, unblemished despite the warts. There is no one who needs help in this perfection, but giving up might be helpful.


YOUR MIND CAN perhaps just accept enlightenment, or however you want to put it and describe it, on a conceptual level, which is after all the mind’s only level. It can say, “OK. I am the awareness that everything arises in. All this really solid-seeming appearance, I understand that it’s illusory, just so much energy, just so many electrical mind-interpretations, from a mind in a brain that is comprised of atoms that contain nothing. I fully understand that this is all meaningless, and that it’s just nothing, wanting to be something; life wanting to be. I completely accept that this is my true nature, that what I truly am is not knowable, and the day-to-day life I seem to lead is not lead by me, nor does it exist in time, and that feeling of being me is actually a big ME, common to everything and everyone, with different apparent content. All that stuff I’ve read and discussed, I know this to be true, true in an absolute sense, even if I can’t get around the need to understand what is ineffable.”

AND THEN, just move on. Live your life with all your apparent tools. Stop identifying with being a seeker, because you know there’s no such thing…you are awareness, and you accept that. In the story of your life that the mind will always facilitate for you, the “ah ha” moment, which you know is probably not anything different from what you already experience, will likely come…and if it doesn’t, it doesn’t matter, because you’re living your life in the best way you can, free from any notions that it will all be “better” “after” enlightenment because your poor, belaboured mind now accepts that everything you need – all of eternity and infinity – is already always the case. 

IF THE ILLUSION of reality is recognised and the desire for enlightenment abandoned, this striving, straining, project-building, happiness-confirming, comfort-saving unfolding of the human story can, at last, be fully stepped into and lived. The ego may arise, but its validation is no longer the tale being told. So roll up your sleeves and dig into it - with the ego, or egoless, whatever it seems like – and even if it seems black and full of despair, it's a miracle there is anything to do or feel or think or be at all.  Relish it all.

* * * * *
Copyright 2012, Suzanne Foxton
All Rights Reserved, Used by Permission




LINKS

Suzanne's Website: http://bit.ly/7Jb8YF




On Barnes & Noble: http://bit.ly/LqQUF4

On Non-Duality Press: http://bit.ly/KfUzo7

BATGAP Interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dgh2Aac3PIo

Conscious TV Interview, Part I:  http://bit.ly/7uR7Tq
Conscious TV Interview, Part II: http://bit.ly/Ki3K7L

On Atheist Nexus, A Community of Non-theists: http://bit.ly/LrxBYN

Urban Guru Cafe Interview: http://bit.ly/3ukMVh

Advaita Academy Interview: http://bit.ly/KVBerq

On You Tube (lots!): http://bit.ly/Ki4Pwq



Housekeeping Notes:
First off, if you are viewing this site through a mobile browser, let me share that there is a lot here that you may be missing.  We've added several of what I call Guest Writer pages.  These writers include Greg Goode, who's been with us quite a while, and who has recently been joined by Nathan Gill, James Waite, and Vicki Woodyard over the past few weeks.  

Now, just this week, my dear friend and mentor, Scott Kiloby joins us in a big way.  We'll be hosting Scott's book, Reflections of the One Life: Daily Pointers to Enlightenment, on its own page.  Every Sunday I'll put up seven new reflections for the coming week.  It's a real coup for Awakening Clarity, and a real gift from Scott to our readers.  

You can reach the new pages via your mobile, but you'll need to click for the Full Version of the site, and then play with the sizing until you can click on the individual pages and go from there.  It's worth your trouble, I assure you.  I do hope you'll join me in welcoming all of these writers, who are sharing everything you see here--which is a lot--strictly out of their love for this teaching.  I bow in gratitude to all of them.

 

Thursday, May 17, 2012

"So, am I awake yet, or WHAT?"














WELCOME.  Our guest this week is not a guest at all.  It's me.  I'm carrying out my threat from last week and publishing a post of my own, for the first time in four months.  We'll zigzag back and forth between guest teachers and myself until we don't.  I'm planning to write something every other week, but after having spent many hours on this week's post, it might not be quite so regular!  We'll see.  I'm working on a book, and I earn my living online, so I move from keyboard chore to keyboard chore without ever leaving my chair.  I've come to see that my chairness is slowly killing me, so I've taken up lifting weights and walking again.  I hope the walking will turn into the joy of running, but for now I'm content with some ordinary ambulation.  Still, I love what I do here; I just love it a little too much!  While it's a nice change to be back writing on the main board, I've really loved editing the Guest Teachings Series, and it's "grown me," so to speak.  I'll put that hat back on next week, and Suzanne Foxton will be with us, so don't bail out just because you see a post from me!

YOU ARE INVITED to write in with questions that you want to see answered here.  If I feel qualified, I'll answer them.  If I don't, I won't.  *[Please see the note at the bottom of this post.] The idea here is to actually tell the truth, which is a more radical notion than it may sound.  The truth never changes, but my view of it sure does, so I'm bound to contradict myself if you hang around long enough.  In that same vein, the absolute and relative levels are completely not interchangeable, so if I'm answering a question on one level, there's no way it won't conflict with the same question answered on the other, and contradictions are the rule, not the exception. So be it.  I'm surrendered to all of that noise and confusion, so there's no point in your suffering over it either.  Let's both relax, not put each other on trial, and simply go easy.  There's a good Nondual pointer for you: go easy.  In regard to your questions, let me say that while I can't be as specific-to-your-case here as I would be in a personal email, I can certainly go into your query in far more detail here than I can in individual notes. And until we get to finer points and sharper questions, I think specificity is unnecessary.  Practical questions are always best; esoterica is mostly mind-chatter and I tend to go numb and quiet.

THIS WEEK'S COLUMN answers a question I get fairly regularly.  It radiates confusion.  These emails usually start out something like, "I'm awake, but..."  Most of the time I don't need to read the rest of the letter (though I always do), because I already know just where that seeker is sitting.  I sat there myself, off and on, for years. I asked others the very same question myself.  I get it!  What these seekers really want to ask is the question the title of this post asks, they just don't want to be thought of as "unawake" while they're doing so.  I didn't either.  If it makes you feel any better at all, everybody reading this sentence is WIDE awake.  Already!  Promise.  Or we could say that no one who's reading it is awake, which would be equally true.  Go figure.  Go easy.

SO, ALTHOUGH I've individually answered this question for the folks who wrote in, let me answer it for the many more of you who bear the same confusion, but haven't written.  Let me again suggest that you climb down out of the spectator stands and get involved.  It really helps.  I hope this does, too.

AND NOW . . .


So, am I awake yet, or what?
 By
Fred Davis


ONE RESPONSE that arises when someone asks me something along the line of, "Hey, am I awake, or what?" is exactly this:

"IF YOU'RE CONCERNED about whether you're awake or not, then you're not--at least not right now."  Such a question simply would not occur to conscious awakeness. Since we've already said that everyone is equally awake, then all we are ever talking about is if we are or are not consciously awake, knowingly awake. If we can get clear on this we can see that there's no room left for higher or lower, better or worse. more spiritual or less.  All of those things spring from positions, which conscious awareness simply doesn't have.  The apparently separate being it's working through will certainly have positions--that's what a separate being is--but not the awakeness behind it.  

LEST WE NOW JUMP over to the other side and pull a quick and oh-so-typical Spiritual 180 (as I call them), let's listen to a wise friend of mine.  A couple of weeks ago, when I shared the fact that I thought I was going to write this article, he immediately shot me the following terrific advice:

[In referring to this article...] "It's a good idea but there is one important caveat that needs to be included.  One should watch out for that desire going underground and manifesting as a certainty and confidence that I am awake.  "Before, I was in doubt.  Fred said that this doubt is a sign that I am not awake. Therefore I have seen through this, and no longer have the question."

DO YOU SEE how tricky all of this is?  It's unbelievable.  You can hardly dance for stepping on your own feet!  Unless you entered this teaching with an extraordinarily light load of karma--which I most assuredly did not--there's almost no way to weave through the apparent awakening process without making lots of foolish mistakes.  I have been an absolute unholy fool in all of this for 30 years running. The under-appreciated Bonehead Way has clearly been my path, and often still is.  It's ugly, but it does seem to work. I'm willing to be wrong, and to be seen to be wrong--even here, publicly--and to be corrected by higher authorities (ouch!) if it means I get to see my errors of thought and action, and thereby be given the chance to see through them.  I will lead with my chin if it's the only thing I have to lead with.  Most of the time it is.

PART OF WHAT I'm saying here is that it pays to want this thing a lot.  Casual seekers beware.  Or not.  Anything can happen; I don't know anything about sureness.  So I'm not saying that passion is required, but I am saying that it sure as hell helps.  It also means you're going to get ahead of yourself from time to time.  I have the scars to prove it, and so do those closest to me.


I'VE MADE embarrassing proclamations; made ugly errors in deed and word; I've too often unwittingly tortured those around me.  In short, I've repeatedly made an ass out of myself, as in. "Hi, Bill. have you noticed that I'm basically the new, improved Ramana Maharshi?  No?  Well, it probably doesn't show up for someone like you just yet.  Others see it, I mean at least probably they do.  They should.  At the very least, I see it!  Once you get a little clearer--if you ever do--you'll easily be able to spot it, too!  In the meantime, hang on my every word, okay?" I've made this example far-fetched in order to make my point humorously, but sadly enough, it's not as far-fetched as I'd like it to be.  Just because I don't stink as bad as the next guy doesn't mean I don't stink.

ANOTHER RESPONSE that arises to meet our question doesn't attempt to answer the question at all, but rather raises another question, or series of questions: "Who's this you who's claiming to be awake?  Who is this you that can't seem to stay awake?  Who woke up to begin with?"  Gotcha.

I SAY THAT BECAUSE, when we have an authentic seeing, or more accurately, when authentic being arises openly, the one common factor, regardless of background, is that the one who appears to be experiencing this dramatic unveiling is now known to be utterly nonexistent, at least in terms of autonomy.  From the standpoint of the mind, it's a real head shaker.  You just can't figure it out, and you can't keep from trying.  However, from the absolute view, there's nothing to figure out.  It's just the way things are.  From the point of initial seeing on, the seeking game changes.  We're no longer trying to move ahead into clarity.  We're done with all that nonsense, for goodness sake.  Now, by God, we're trying to move back into clarity!  This seeking is even more fruitless and deadlier than what we were doing before, because we usually have more openness and humility before such an event than we do afterwards!  We didn't know what we didn't know.  Now we think we do.  It's pretty stagnating.  So how does all of this happen?



MORE OFTEN THAN NOT, this freshly exposed, non-existent self quickly appropriates this new information, adds it to its wealth of treasures that are designed to keep it special and separate, and then plows right on, as deluded as ever, even though it knows better.  So far as I know, there's no chance of actually unseeing what's been seen.  There's no unringing that bell.  Yet side-by-side with that knowing there can and usually does exist denial of, and resistance to that very same knowing.  To know That is to lose me, which is a damn tough call until it's not.  Thus we have the paradox from hell that runs until it doesn't.  As close to the truth as words will allow is to say that the hoax itself perpetuates the hoax. Sometimes this hoaxness even goes on to  teach other people that they can be autonomous non-existent beings too!  Who said spirituality was pretty?


LET'S TALK ABOUT language for a moment.  When I ask, "Who's this you?" and all that sort of thing, I'm not advocating staying away from personal pronouns; that's tiresome and patently ridiculous. We can and do still use language provisionally.  I love language, hence the writerness.  We can actually use words just the same as we did prior to coming to Nonduality, prior to some experience of seeing-being, but with the tacit understanding that these words are now inherently untrue. What I'm saying is that due to the nature and context of the question that was given me ("Am I awake or not?"), in that specific case I have sensed an underlying cloudiness in the questioner.  It just shows.  The reason I can see it is not because I'm some sort of Cool Nondual. I can see it because I've ignorantly bloodied my nose in exactly that same way against exactly the same mirror--over and over again.  For years.

LET ME GO ON to suggest that if we find ourselves "tip-toeing through the language fields," that is, afraid to say, "I need an aspirin," or "I need to go to the bathroom," then we might want to check ourselves and make sure that this careful tip-toeing is not a cover-up for our own unsureness, or else a move to impress everyone with the implied proclamation, which is, "Look at me!  I am enlightened!  There's NO ONE here, I say!"  I know all about this.  I'm guilty of having performed entire ballets of such figurative tip-toeing.  So what?  It's common and it's okay; it's all part of the charade and there's no shame in it.  Yet the death of spiritual progress lies in believing these positions and remaining caught in them.  It's easier than you want to think.  I'm lucky to have someone who'll shove me out of them before I even know I'm in them.  I guarantee you he'll find parts of this very article to clobber me with.  It's great!  Believing our own positions, including the sweet lie that we have no positions, happens most often when we are going it alone, as I did for a long, long time.  I didn't want help from anyone who might tell me I wasn't already awake!  Which means I was caught in an endless loop.  I was going to my own ego for outside advice.  And then taking it!  Oops.

ANY DECENT TEACHER--and there are a lot of them out there--will easily point out our error, and help us remedy it by showing us the flaws in our thinking and then sending us back to the way of experiencing.  They help us climb down out of our heads and plant our feet back onto terra firma.  I'm confident we can even catch this thing on our own if we're both willing and capable of being absolutely honest with ourselves.  That's no easy trick.  I couldn't do it, but if you can, my hat is off and I wish you well.

 

LET'S LOOK AT another common angle of confusion.  All of these angles are related, by the way, because following an apparent experience of truth there's just one mistake left to be made: incorrect identification.  This core error comes in lots of gradations, from subtle to profound.  I will publicly confess that I still harbor some of this misidentification, but I know people who don't.  Heck, I went for years without even knowing anyone who was so clear; I'm making great progress!  When I say "some" identification, that's not entirely accurate, because as is the case with so much of this, identification is an all or nothing game.  So what I'm saying is that sometimes Fredness is 100% here, and sometimes Fredness is 100% not here.  But there's never any 50/50 proposition, unless Fredness is 100% here, but is lying to itself and declaring that it's not.  Dance step.  Foot mash.

TO GIVE A CLEARER, more general pointing, let's stick with talking about profound misidentification; there are sharper lines to be seen. Say we have what appears to be a real seeing "event".  We know in our hearts it's authentic.  If it's real, there's never any doubt at the time.  Suddenly we are grokking things that we've never understood before.  Books that were thick muck are now joyful reading, all that sort of thing.  Mysterious things our teachers have told are now understood.  I've often laughed when such a thing bubbles up from long ago, and I see, "Damn, he/she was sharing obvious truth way back then."  We have really and truly "seen the monkey" as I sometimes put it. We get it.  Everything is swell. Until it's not.  The apparent seeing event may last a few seconds or a few days, but however long it lasts, at some point we begin to notice that it's wearing thin.  Rather than living via experiencing, we're back caught in thought. We're now referencing our former experiencing through memory.  We're back to living in interpretation instead of reality.  

(By the way, it's common for doubts about an awakening-type experience to arise later.  Did that really happen?  Maybe they're right, and I am crazy?  We sometimes deny the truth as surely as Jesus' disciples did in the Garden of Gethsemane.  Oh well, we're only human.  Aren't we?)

OUR BLISSFUL EVENT, like any event, passes, leaving us stranded as ordinary people in an ordinary world.  What a drag!  We liked the specialness better!  If this has happened to you--as it did me--then I would say go take another look at my first two responses, because we're essentially left with asking the same question.  Conscious awareness is perfectly content with the extraordinary ordinary.  Every story is seen to be equally unique and equally empty.  In my opinion, which is not particularly humble, any seeing that runs contrary to this is not coming from awakeness.  That doesn't mean we adopt the absolute view as some philosophical view.  The absolute view doesn't work as a philosophical view.  It'll just make you cold as hell and stupid as a stone.  We don't want to tell a friend who's mate just died that it's all hunky-dory, because their loved one was never with us in the first place.  That's not wisdom, that's cruelty.  Following an apparent seeing event, the attempted transference of absolute-level views to the relative, or relative-level views to the absolute, is the cause of most of our confusion.  And pain.  They just don't mix.  That's why they call all of this a paradox.  
 

WHETHER WE'RE AWAKE OR NOT is really not all that confusing.  The truth is, when we're not functioning from awakeness we simply don't want to see that we're not. That's what happens with me, even now.  I never fluctuate mentally any more.  I know who I am 100% of the time--including when I'm not acting from it. There is no mental oscillation, and thus there is no longer any classic seeking.  But I don't know who I am 100% of the time in regard to how I feel, on the deepest gut level.  As a result, there is still subtle seeking.  There, I've said it.  Shoot me.  There is still some false sense of containership here, "within which" it feels like consciousness is functioning.  Sometimes.  Many of my more recognizable negative behavior patterns are at last falling into line with my understanding.  But among other things, I still reach for a book, click on Google News, do a chore "ahead of time", or even come here and work on the site to break mundane boredom and keep the mind rolling...toward a future that simply doesn't exist. That boredom notion will tell the tale. There is no mundane boredom in conscious awareness, because there is no mundane to be found. 

I CAN OPERATE with clarity and kindness.  Or I can operate in denial and resistance which are just two more names for unconsciousness.  But through it all, I will continue to share what I have from exactly where I am.  I carry that "what I have," for good or ill, into the world when I go grocery shopping.  I shout it daily in how I treat my wife and pets.  And of course I bring it back here, to this incredible mirror known as Awakening Clarity, where I am honor bound to tell the truth as I know it--to both of us.  What a wonderful warm bath this can be.  It can also be a cold shower, when truth and my perception are seen to be different.  It happens.

THIS SITE HAS changed me. It has opened up my world like a giant oyster knife.  I know people all over the world, seekers and teachers both, that I didn't know six months  or a year ago, and I know myself better as well.  And yes, I am clearer than I was; much clearer.  There are posts on this site that I would never write today.  They stand.  They'll meet someone right where they are, even if it's only to shine a light on the price of arrogance, erroneous notions, or teaching too early out of the gate.  There's a lot of good stuff here as well.  The Fredness-that-I-am-not is nonetheless proud of some of it, delusional as that may appear to be.  One way or the other, it all stands, every bit of it.

I'M WILLING TO BE WHO I AM, which includes accepting who I have been at every step in this amazing life, whether on a seemingly pious spiritual path or a decidedly wicked one.  Only from this place of honesty, candor and surrender is Who I Really Am likely to come out of hiding and consciously, knowingly, stay out of hiding.  I hope you'll join me as I witness and record the journey.  It's sort of like what happens in this chair.  I go from this to that, and that to the other, but I never really go anywhere at all.  Namaste.



Housekeeping Notes: Don't forget that the site's automated email no longer works, so if you want to keep up with us, follow via RSS.  I do that, and it works just fine.

Starting a little later this week we'll start running portions of Scott Kiloby's Reflections of the One Life on Awakening Clarity.  That's his daily meditation book that is one of my favorite books of all time.  I'll be posting a week's worth of reflections at a time; probably on Sundays.  It's an incredibly generous thing for Scott to do. It's this kind of selfless action, which I have seen from him over and over again, that makes him one of my Very Favorite Humans.  (You should still buy the book!)

*This post was written prior to my taking Awakening Clarity bi-weekly with GTS-only posting.  You are still invited to write, but the question should be well defined.  My answers will likely be brief, but as helpful as I can make them.--Fred